Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. There is a good number of Americans whose interest is to see the part played by money in politics being put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
You will learn that the ruling made by the High Court was stuck to. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.